I use these sizes often and depending on the source chosen, you sometimes find conflicting information on them. Many times I see various sources list much heavier bow weights for the 2117 and 2315 size and wonder if it is based on what I believe was the old wood arrow standard rating spine on a 26" long arrow?
However, regarding the Easton aluminums:
Checked some actual 2117 Easton Legacy arrows I have in the closet, they are marked 60-65# Longbow. Don't have any 2315 Legacies, but my 2219s say 70#-75# Longbow. Guessing that for a longbow, the 2315 would be in between at 65#-70#?
However, these numbers differ from the Easton recommendations for recurves shown below and thinking that recurves by design have a bit more initial snap, so may explain the slightly lower poundage recommendations given for them.
Checked a 2006 Easton Arrow Guide book I have. Using a 125 grain head with a 29" arrow (should you pull the standard 28" and cut them an inch longer) see 2117 recommended for 44# - 54# recurve bows with 2315 recommended for 54# - 64# recurves.
Then, using the Easton chart selector at EastonArchery.com for once again the recurve bow, 29" arrow and 125 grain head, see similar results with 2117 listed for 44# through 53# and the .340 spine (or 2315 arrow, since Easton no longer makes them in the Legacy model) listed for 59# to 63#.
Interesting to see that Easton now makes a 2217 Legacy, but a quick check didn't show spine info for it.